Bankruptcy is an important mechanism for resolving insolvency and reallocating resources in the economy. Despite the common belief that transparency is central to the bankruptcy system, there is little evidence on how it affects bankruptcy outcomes. In this paper, I exploit two sources of plausibly exogenous variation in disclosure during a bankruptcy: the random assignment of bankruptcy judges who may differ in interpreting the disclosure requirements of the law, and a significant change in regulation that increased the disclosure by certain creditors but not others. I show that more information disclosure improves recovery rates and other outcome variables by alleviating inefficiencies stemming from stakeholders’ conflicting interests. I also identify the potential costs and distributional effects of disclosure, as well as the underlying mechanisms for the efficiency gains. My findings provide some of the first evidence on the role of information disclosure within the corporate bankruptcy process and offer new insights to the broader accounting literature on disclosure.