Robert Kuan

Robert Kuan
  • Doctoral Candidate

Contact Information

  • office Address:

    3730 Walnut Street
    527.4 Jon M Huntsman Hall
    Philadelphia, PA 19104

Overview

Rob is a PhD student at Wharton researching decision-making, self-control, and behavior change.

He primarily uses large-scale field studies to investigate how people can change their behavior—especially when facing self-control challenges or when initial intentions do not match subsequent follow-through. He is also interested in why individuals choose to restructure their environments to pursue their goals.

Prior to entering his PhD program, Rob has worked with labs in Stanford, Wharton, UCLA, and University of British Columbia to conduct research on decision making, financial well-being, and behavioral change interventions. In his previous life, Rob worked as a management consultant at Charles River Associates and director of data product management at Personal Capital, a Silicon Valley tech company acquired in 2020.

Rob received his Bachelor of Science in Economics from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania in 2011.

Continue Reading

Research

  • Rob Kuan, Kristin Blagg, Benjamin Castleman, Rajeev Darolia, Jordan Matsudaira, Katherine L. Milkman, Lesley Turner (2025), Behavioral Nudges Prevent Loan Delinquencies At Scale: A 12-Million Person Field Experiment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2416708122 Abstract

    Americans collectively hold over $1.6 trillion in student loan debt, and over the last decade millions of borrowers have defaulted on loans, with serious consequences for their financial health. In a 13-million-person field experiment with the U.S. Department of Education, we tested the effectiveness of different email interventions to inform borrowers about alternative repayment options after a missed loan payment. Our interventions tested whether sending monthly behaviorally-informed emails, providing follow-up reminders, framing benefits in percentage (vs. dollar) terms, and providing just one recommended action step at a time (vs. two) affected borrower outcomes. We find that i) behaviorally-informed emails reduce estimated 60-d delinquencies by 0.42 pp, ii) reminders boost the efficacy of such emails by 0.57 pp, iii) describing potential savings in percentage terms is more effective than describing these benefits in dollar terms, reducing estimated delinquencies by 0.14 pp, and iv) encouraging two actions (i.e., enrollment in income-driven repayment plans and auto debit programs) repeatedly across two emails is marginally more effective than encouraging one action at-a-time across two emails, reducing estimated delinquencies by 0.05 pp. Overall, if scaled to all 13-million borrowers in our experiment, we estimate that our best-performing intervention would have averted approximately 79,800 60-d delinquencies. Our findings i) highlight the benefits of describing potential savings in percentage terms, which may magnify perceived savings for recipients, ii) underscore the risks of oversimplification, and iii) demonstrate that nudges can be an effective, low-cost complement to other policies for reducing delinquencies and supporting borrowers with student loan debt.

In the News

Knowledge @ Wharton

Activity

Latest Research

Rob Kuan, Kristin Blagg, Benjamin Castleman, Rajeev Darolia, Jordan Matsudaira, Katherine L. Milkman, Lesley Turner (2025), Behavioral Nudges Prevent Loan Delinquencies At Scale: A 12-Million Person Field Experiment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2416708122
All Research

In the News

How Today’s Entrepreneurs Create Value Through Innovation and Grit

Wharton vice dean discusses her new book about paths to entrepreneurship.Read More

Knowledge @ Wharton - 2025/04/16
All News