Early stage entrepreneurial technology firm strategy is incomplete. Uncertainties and unknowns need to be identified; activities, structures, and routines need to be worked out; and resources need to be acquired. Each of which could result in changes to the strategy. Resource acquisition, especially venture investment, has often been used as a proxy measure for success, yet little is known about how the process of resource acquisition impacts the coincident process of strategy evolution in early stage firms. Through an 11-year, birth to death, longitudinal, qualitative field study of Ohm, a firm developing novel technology with the potential for industry disruption, I examined this question. I found that the process of attracting and appeasing venture investors drove many significant decisions including which product to target and when. Notably, those decisions led to both a successful product launch and the entrepreneurial firm being considered unfundable by those same venture investors. Examining this impact, I identified two properties entrenched in the current model of venture investment that had negative effects on the technology firm’s strategy evolution: the entrepreneur’s clock and the regulatory focus shift of venture investors from promotion to prevention. This research contributes to entrepreneurial strategy and finance by uncovering how resource acquisition can be both a measure of progress and a driver of firm strategy, and how venture investors can indirectly, but significantly impact not only the potential for firm success but also what firm is created in the process.