This research investigates the origin of first-mover beliefs, arguing that the success of the idea of first mover advantage in the social marketplace of ideas is rooted in cultural beliefs and personal experience that favor “first-ness”. Beliefs in first mover advantage dominate the mainstream media despite mixed evidence in the academic literature (study 1A), and exposure to the business press is associated with increased belief in first mover advantage (study 1B). Indeed, first mover beliefs appear rooted in culture: first mover beliefs are enhanced by priming American culture (study 2A) and are more favorable among American versus Chinese respondents (study 2B). Subsequent experimental work confirms that even naïve subjects exhibit spontaneous beliefs in first mover advantage. Such spontaneous beliefs are as strong as beliefs reported after considering self-generated or presented exemplars favoring moving first (studies 3A and 3B), and exemplar-driven judgment produces stronger beliefs in first mover advantage than analytic reasoning (study 4). Moreover, such beliefs tend to persevere: first mover beliefs are neutralized but not reversed by considering exemplars of the disadvantages of moving first (studies 3A, 3B, and 4). In addition, providing contradictory evidence or labeling the opposing “rapid responder” counter-belief proved insufficient to overcome spontaneous beliefs in the advantages of moving first (study 5). Finally, the findings for personal and analogical experience also held for a professional sample with business experience (study 6). Taken together, these studies suggest that beliefs in first mover advantage are “sticky” and difficult to overcome, rooted as they are in personal experience and the cultural environment.
This research examines the perseverance of beliefs in first-mover advantage. A media analysis indicates that beliefs in first-mover advantage dominate the mainstream media despite mixed evidence in the academic literature (Study 1). Moreover, exposure to the business press is associated with increased belief in first-mover advantage. Experimental work suggests that the success of the idea of first-mover advantage in the social marketplace of ideas is rooted in personal experience and cultural beliefs that favor “first-ness”. Even naïve subjects exhibit spontaneous beliefs in first-mover advantage that are neutralized but not reversed by considering exemplars of the disadvantages of moving first (Studies 2A and 2B). Moreover, providing contradictory evidence or labeling the opposing “rapid responder” counter-belief is insufficient to overcome a belief in first-mover advantage (Study 3). Taken together, these studies suggest that beliefs in first-mover advantage are “sticky” and difficul