Jon M. Huntsman Hall
Room 672
Links: Personal Website
Prof. Strohminger’s research approaches key questions in business ethics through the lens of psychology.
She holds a B.A. in Cognitive Science from Brown University and a Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of Michigan. She completed postdoctoral fellowships at Duke University and Yale University. She keeps winning teaching awards, for some reason.
A wee selection of some recent publications.
This course explores business responsibility from rival theoretical and managerial perspectives. Its focus includes theories of ethics and their application to case studies in business. Topics include moral issues in advertising and sales; hiring and promotion; financial management; corporate pollution; product safety; and decision-making across borders and cultures.
Traditionally, the problem of decision-making under uncertainty is presented in terms of the cognitive limitations of the decision-maker. This course explores the problem in terms of how information is manipulated, withheld, and outright fabricated by those controlling the information flow. Environments rich in corrupted information generate a unique suite of challenges for the decision-maker, among them how to interpret expert testimony, scientific data, advertisements, and claims from business leaders and media. Beginning with the foundational issue of information asymmetry, this course provides a wide-ranging review of the many ways that uncertainty is used to stymie our ability to draw unbiased conclusions. Topics covered include: the weaponization of confidence and doubt, spin, the modern attention economy, deep fakes, and how to distinguish experts from frauds. We will examine various strategies for balancing skepticism with trust, particularly in corrupted systems. By the end of the course, you will have an understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of corrupted information, and a toolkit for navigating the obstacles it places between the decision-maker and the truth.
Traditionally, the problem of decision-making under uncertainty is presented in terms of the cognitive limitations of the decision-maker. This course explores the problem in terms of how information is manipulated, withheld, and outright fabricated by those controlling the information flow. Environments rich in corrupted information generate a unique suite of challenges for the decision-maker, among them how to interpret expert testimony, scientific data, advertisements, and claims from business leaders and media. Beginning with the foundational issue of information asymmetry, this course provides a wide-ranging review of the many ways that uncertainty is used to stymie our ability to draw unbiased conclusions. Topics covered include: the weaponization of confidence and doubt, spin, the modern attention economy, deep fakes, and how to distinguish experts from frauds. We will examine various strategies for balancing skepticism with trust, particularly in corrupted systems. By the end of the course, you will have an understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of corrupted information, and a toolkit for navigating the obstacles it places between the decision-maker and the truth.
Mentored research involving data collection. Students do independent empirical work under the supervision of a faculty member, leading to a written paper. Normally taken in the junior or senior year.
The Honors Program has been developed to recognize excellence in psychology among Penn undergraduates and to enhance skills related to psychological research. The 4998 credit signifies an Honors Independent Study, completed as part of the Honors Program. The honors program involves: (a) completing a year-long empirical research project in your senior year under the supervision of a faculty member (for a letter grade). This earns 2 cu's. (b) completing a second term of statistics (for a letter grade) before graduation. (c) participating in the year-long Senior Honors seminar (for a letter grade). This seminar is designed especially for Psychology Honors majors; this receives a total of 1 cu. (d) participating in the Undergraduate Psychology Research Fair in the Spring semester, at which honors students present a poster and give a 15-minute talk about their research. (e) a total of 15 cu's in psychology is required. Students will be selected to be part of the Honors Program in the Spring of their junior year (see application process online)
Harper’s wrote a poetic blurb about my research for its June 2022 issue: https://harpers.org/archive/2022/06/life-inc-corporate-insecthood/
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Knowledge @ Wharton - 2026/04/9